Aims and Requirements for Research Committees

I. Statutory rights and obligations
II. Services provided to RCs, WGs,TGs
III. Duties of RCs, WGs and TGs
IV. Guidelines
V. Policy for ISA awards

I. Statutory rights and obligations

1. Research Committees (RC) are expected to carry out the relevant policies of the ISA and to follow the ISA Statutes. Each member of each RC should have a copy of the Statutes of the ISA. Please request copies from the Executive Secretary of ISA if required.

The points below follow the spirit of the ISA Statutes. Where the Statutes do not cover relevant details, they have been supplemented to give guidance on practical interpretation.

2. Each RC is required to have written Statutes which reflect the principles and Statutes of the ISA, and have been approved by the majority (more than one-half) of the RC members in good standing (members who had paid membership dues for the current year). The approved Statutes of each RC must include among others the following three important provisions:

(a) Rules on the election of a Steering Board with a definite term of office. Such an election must be carried out by democratic procedures as approved by the ISA Research Council, representing all of the RC members in good standing. The election rules must include Provisions on how to fill in vacancies arising between World Congresses (for example, vacancies may be filled by appointment by the RC president).

(b) The Steering Board should consist of a president, a secretary, and at least 3 other members; all its members must be regular individual members in good standing of the ISA.

(c) Provision for the payment of dues, without which no member will be in good standing in the ISA and in the RC.

(d) Clear regulations on the procedures to amend the RC Statutes.

3. All regular RC members are expected to be ISA individual members in good standing and only they are entitled to vote in the RC's affairs.

4. The Steering Board of a RC may invite others to take part in RC activities as guests or special participants but priority must be given at all times to RC members in good standing and only the latter are entitled to vote in RC's affairs (see point I.3 above).

5. To maintain its status as an RC of ISA, each RC must continue to meet the conditions laid down as necessary for eligibility to become a new RC. That is, at the time of application, the group should have at least 25 individual ISA members in good standing, and with geographical diversity as determined by the Executive Committee. Furthermore, each RC's membership shall consist of regular individual members in good standing with the ISA in a number and with geographical diversity as determined by the Executive Committee.

6. Each RC is expected to include within its activities a broad range of areas and approaches; where appropriate, this may be reflected in the creation of sub-committees with sufficient autonomy to pursue their more specialised research interests. Each RC is also expected to organise a programme of activities at each World Congress, and to arrange at least one independent meeting between one World Congress and the next.

7. Each RC should have a newsletter for communication among members covering the RC activities and other relevant types of material.

8. Each RC is represented on the Research Council, on which it has one vote. Each RC is entitled to elect one representative, and one alternate who may stand in for the representative. The alternate member may also attend the Research Council meetings as an observer when the representative is present, but is not entitled to vote. Please note:

(a) The Research Council plays a vital role in the ISA's formal structure as it represents the entire constituency of individual ISA members organized in Research Committees (RCs), Working Groups (WGs) and Thematic Groups (TGs).

(b) The Research Council together with the Council of National Associations (CNA) which represents the collective members of ISA, form the highest decision-making body of the ISA, the Assembly of Councils.

(c) The Research Council elects half of the members of the ISA Executive Committee; oversees and promotes research activities among the RCs, WGs, and TGs; and makes decisions on the establishment, demotion and abolition of RCs, WGs, and TGs.

(d) The Research Council meets at each World Congress, and at least once in between Congresses. At the intermediate meetings, there is often an associated research seminar or academic conference.

9. Policy guidelines for Research Committees with double affiliations

(a) An agreement needs to be signed between the RC, ISA and other international associations.

(b) At least 50% of Board Members have to be ISA members in good standing.

(c) Research Committees has to have a minimum of 25 ISA members in good standing

(d) Allocation of grants and of slots at the World Congress are based on the number of ISA members in good standing.

Beyond the points listed above, each RC is free to organise itself as it wishes, to administer its own funds, to engage in any activities it considers appropriate to its objectives, and to cooperate with other academic and non-academic bodies.

II. Services provided to RCs, WGs,TGs

The ISA secretariat provides a range of services to RCs, WGs and TGs which include:

1. Grants
The grants will be allocated to the Research Committees to support activities, such as conferences, workshops and the production and distribution of their newsletter (printed and/or electronic).

Every Research Committee in good standing is entitled to apply for a grant once between the two World Congresses, which implies the following conditions:

a) The Research Committee must send to its members and to the ISA Secretariat at least one newsletter every year (printed or electronic).

b) The Research Committee must send a detailed report of its activities to the ISA Secretariat.

c) The Research Committee must organize an international conference where all its members can participate. The theme must be sufficiently general to attract most of the members and not related only to the interests of a small group of individuals.

d) The Research Committee must hold regular elections of its board.

e) The Research Committee must have its own membership dues. The current minimum fee set by the ISA Executive Committee is US$10 discount fee for a 4 year period.

f) The Research Committee must submit a short proposal to support its grant application and must send a report at the end of the period for which the grant was allocated.

The total amount given to the Research Committees grants will be approximately 10% of all individual membership dues collected by the ISA in a 4 year period. Grants will be allocated according to the following scale:

Grants will be paid in two installments: upon approval and upon receiving a final report.

Grant Application form
rtf file	pdf file

Applications for a small bonus amount where two or more Research Committees and/or a Research Committee in combination with a national or regional association want to organize a joint activity will be considered. Participating Research Committees and associations must be in good standing with ISA.

2. Collection of dues on behalf of RCs, WGs and TGs
Dues can be paid to the ISA Secretariat by credit card, personal cheque or bank transfer. A payee's name and address are immediately forwarded to the secretary of the relevant RC, WG, TG. The amounts collected on behalf of the RCs, WGs, TGs, are transferred free of charge every six months to each RC, WG, TG bank account (or, if preferred, sent by cheque).

How does this service benefit Research Committees?

(a) Research Committees do not lose money on banking charges: they are absorbed by the ISA which processes all individual payments.

(b) Research Committees do not have to maintain any tedious membership administration and book-keeping: the ISA Secretariat does it for them.

(c) Although Research Committees officers change every four years a continuity of the membership administration is secured by the ISA Secretariat.

Note that the ISA Secretariat only deals with the payment of RC dues by ISA members. Dues (if any) from RC's guests or special participants have to be dealt with by the RC.

3. Preparation of membership lists.
Each Research Committee can request at any time from the ISA Secretariat a current list of ISA members who have paid their RC dues through the ISA Secretariat. Such a list can be provided by e-mail, on a diskette, on self-adhesive labels, or as a computer print-out.

4. Sending out renewal reminders.
ISA Secretariat each year sends out renewal reminders to ISA members whose dues to ISA and relevant RCs, WGs TGs have to be paid.

5. Internet service.
ISA Secretariat uses e-mail for daily correspondence and also for the circulation of announcements of meetings, calls for papers, etc., which come from the RCs, WGs and TGs.

The Web World Wide Home Page provides general information about the ISA (structure, activities, publications) as well as about each Research Committee, Working and Thematic Group. The content of the home page relating to RCs is constantly being updated on the basis of the information received directly from the RCs, WGs, TGs. If a RC, WG or TG has its own home page, a direct link is established and thus each group can alter its home page itself.

III. Duties of RCs, WGs and TGs

RCs, WGs and TGs are expected to submit to the ISA Secretariat:

1. Reports every two years of their activities when requested.
These reports should include:

(a) details of publications made and planned, both newsletters and other types of publication;

(b) a list of current officers and dates of the next Board election. As far as possible, elections for the Steering Board should be held every fours years at a business meetings scheduled during the week of the World Congress;

(c) details of past and planned meetings and other activities.

The reports are reviewed by the Research Coordinating Committee at its meetings every two years.

Activities Report form
rtf file	pdf file

2. The current list of members whose dues are collected directly by the RC ,WG, TG and not by the ISA. Such list should be received at the ISA Secretariat by January 31 of each year so that they can be included in an annual Directory of ISA and RC, WG, TG Members.

3. A copy of each issue of the newsletter as soon as it is produced

IV. Guidelines

Approved by ISA Research Council, Montreal, August 1997

The ISA Research Council approved four sets of recommendations:
A. Basic minimum requirements
B. Good practices for Research Committees (RCs)
C. Support and incentives from ISA Executive Committee and Secretariat
D. Dealing with shortcoming

A. Basic minimum requirements

A1. Publish and submit to ISA Secretariat current list of RC paid-up members. The ISA Secretariat will provide current lists to each Research Committee.

A2. Maintain a minimum of 25 ISA paid-up members.

A3. Members from at least 10 countries in 2 continents or 7 countries in 3
continents.

A4. Statutes should reflect the ISA Statutes.

A5. Appropriate activity between World Congresses as indicated in B5 below.

A6. Communicate and provide routine information to Secretariat and appoint delegate and alternate to ISA Research Council.

B. Good practices for Research Committees

B1. Membership

B1.1 Keep up-to-date membership list with dues renewal status and dates.
B1.2 Systematic reminders on dues payment and deletion of those who have lapsed.
B1.3 Special dues categories for students and low GNP countries.
B1.4 Membership services should be only for paid-up members.
B1.5 Provide ISA and Research Committee information to members regularly.

B2. Finances

B2.1 Keep accounting system and report accounts to members regularly.
B2.2 Aim at self-financing.
B2.3 Report subsidies received and avoid dependency on any one external body.
B2.4 Encourage participation of sociologists from low GNP countries.

B3. Officers

B3.1 Hold regular elections for Board officers providing for turnover of officers.
B3.2 Make provision for continuity of business across elections.
B3.3 Set up clear division of labour among Board members.
B3.4 Set up system to ensure participation in decision-making of all Board members.

B4. Relations to ISA

B4.1 Encourage individual ISA membership among all RC members.
B4.2 Organise full programme of high quality sessions at ISA World Congresses.
B4.3 Meet deadlines set up for the organisation of the World Congress.
B4.4 Respond promptly to ISA Secretariat's request for routine information and send copies of newsletter to Secretariat and VP(Research).
B4.5 Ensure that your representative to ISA Research Council will be able to attend the meetings.

B5. Activities

B5.1 Have regular newsletter with at least two issues per year.
B5.2 Have at least one interim conference (or other academic activity) and business meeting between World Congresses.
B5.3 Have a system of paper selection to ensure quality & geographical representation.
B5.4 Encourage membership from different countries.
B5.5 Encourage scholarly publications from RC activities.

C. Suggestions for ISA Executive and Secretariat on support and incentives

C1. Produce booklet on ISA philosophy, aims and requirements for Research Committees.
C2. Provide training for Research Committee officers at World Congresses.
C3. Use RC's framework to consult RC officers and involve them organisationally.
C4. Offer a computer template via e-mail for response to Secretariat's requests.
C5. Set up annual prizes on one of these aspects:
C5.1 best reporting of activities;
C5.2 greatest increase in ISA membership;
C5.3 most useful newsletter;
C5.4 greatest improvement in running of RC over specified period;
C5.5 best-run small and large RCs.

D. Suggestions for ISA Executive and Secretariat on dealing with RCs' shortcomings

D1. Send a communique of the action(s) likely to follow with one year time limit.
D2. RCs receiving communique will be put on probationary status.
D3. Provide advice or support to RCs in dealing with shortcomings through either experienced individuals, or a group nominated by the ISA Research Council, or the Research Coordinating Committee.
D4. When there is refusal to meet ISA criteria, appropriate action involves the number of World Congress sessions allocated.
D5. Demotion or closure of a RC is appropriate only when warning had been given and sufficient improvement had not been shown by the specified deadline.

V. Policy for ISA awards

Approved by the ISA Executive Committee, Brisbane 2002.

1. General principles

• (a) Any ISA awards should be for significant contributions to sociology, to international issues directly related to the ISA’s mission, or to the ISA as such.
  
• (b) All proposals for new awards should need the approval of the ISA Executive Committee. Any proposal for a new award should specify its purpose and form, indicate who would be eligible for it, estimate its costs and show how those could be covered, and provide information on whether there were any existing awards or prizes of similar character.
  
• (c) There should not be more than one award of a similar nature (e.g. specifically for junior sociologists, or general whole-career achievement), and overlap with awards or prizes given by other bodies (in particular, the Rokkan Prize of the International Social Science Council for comparative research by a younger person) should be avoided.
  
• (d) Unless awards are aimed at a particular category of person, special care should be taken in the procedures and personnel involved to ensure that gender, language, nationality etc do not stand in the way of equal opportunity to win the award.
  
• (e) Issues of general policy for ISA awards should be decided by the Executive Committee, though it would probably be appropriate to have a subcommittee responsible for formulating proposals. However, such issues will not arise often, so it would be unnecessary that this should be a standing subcommittee.
  
• (f) If Research Committees have awards or prizes, they should be consistent with the ISA’s general policy, and should be described as an award of Research Committee X of the ISA (not of the RC without mention of the ISA, or of the ISA alone); proposals for the establishment of such awards or prizes should be submitted to the ISA Executive Committee for approval.
  
• (g) The award of any awards from the whole ISA, the Research Council or the CNA should be announced at a World Congress (where this might form part of a special ceremony), so they should be given every four years. The timetable leading up to this would need to be planned so that recipients could be sure to be able to attend the World Congress. If there were awards associated with a particular Research Committee or region, they could be given at interim meetings of the appropriate body.

2. Nominations and Selection Process

• (a) Some awards might be intended specifically for ISA members, and others not; that should be decided when an award is first established.
  
• (b) Nominations should be invited from all ISA members, at a date which would allow reasonable opportunities for discussion and liaison before the deadline for their submission was reached. A nomination should normally require more than one supporting member, the number to be specified; the form that it should take would always be that of providing evidence for the merits of the candidate nominated for the award, but what that should consist of would need to be laid down in relation to the nature of the specific award in question. (For instance, the nomination of a single publication would be quite different from the nomination of the record of a whole career.)
  
• (c) A sub-committee or jury should be set up with members appropriate to the particular task; at least one of those members, who will act as chairperson, should be drawn from the Executive Committee. If the award is made by the Research Council, proposals for membership of the jury should be made by the Research Coordinating Committee to the Research Council; if it is made by the Council of National Associations, the National Associations Liaison Committee should make proposals to the CNA.
  
• (d) The jury should report its proposed award to the Executive Committee, which should be required to approve the award; the grounds on which the EC considers approval should be only those of procedural correctness and conformity with general ISA policy on awards.