Bengt Larsson, Ingrid Sahlin
Department of Sociology
University of Gothenburg
Year of completion 2012
language of dissertation English
- criminal records
- criminal background checks
- function creep
|Areas of Research|
- Deviance and Social Control
|This thesis examines the regulation of access to criminal records in Sweden and the actual and potential use of criminal background checks by employers in hiring processes. In recent years, more and more Swedish employers have been required by law to check their job applicants’ criminal records. Also, in a parallel process, the number of enforced subject access requests has increased considerably in that same period. The aim of this thesis is to analyse and explain these two trends and consider their implications for the future use of criminal records in Sweden and elsewhere. The analysis draws upon government documents, newspaper articles, interviews with employers using enforced subject access, and interviews with union and employer organization representatives. The aim of the study is to capture the vocabularies of motive that were evoked and put to use in the attempts to justify and legitimize either the access restrictions or the extended use of criminal records data in hiring decisions.
In Paper I, I examine how subject access, indirect employer access, and the notion of privacy have been understood and defined throughout the history of the Swedish Criminal Records Registry, and how practices and policies in the area have evolved over time.
In Paper II, I investigate how employers who use individuals’ right to subject access in order to obtain copies of their criminal record, account for their practice, and how unions and employer associations have responded to its adoption.
In Paper III, I challenge the ‘governmentality’ tradition in criminology and the way the use of criminal record checks is interpreted within it. As an alternative way of formulating and understanding the issue, I propose that it be looked at from a symbolic perspective.
In Paper IV, my analysis utilizes the perspective of the sociology of scandals to help develop a better understanding of the function creep in the area of data protection. This I do through an examination of the process leading, first, to the introduction of mandatory vetting of childcare workers and teachers in Sweden in 2001, and, then, to the inclusion later of other employer categories in the scope of the relevant legislation.
Based on these analyses, I argue that the changes in the access to individuals’ criminal records reflect the state’s way of governing the interpretation of the criminal records database. Whether actors are denied or allowed access to information contained in the criminal history record database depends on the prevailing cultural representations regarding notions such as ‘privacy’, ‘data protection’, ‘databases’, ‘sensitive information’, and ‘power’. Moreover, I argue that the function creep in the use of criminal history data in Sweden can be initially explained by the occurrence and publicity of scandals that highlight the vulnerability of a group of dependents, which made it defensible to resort to privacy-intrusive methods such as criminal record checks. The continuing function creep was made possible by a changing moral landscape that, following the initial amendment, renders the method morally more defensible among the policy makers and the public at large.